AI-powered proposal evaluation that keeps humans in control
Replace spreadsheets and unstructured notes with a structured evaluation workflow. AI pre-screens vendor responses against every requirement while your evaluators retain full decision-making authority.
Evaluation dashboard at a glance
Everything your evaluation panel needs in one view. No more toggling between spreadsheets, emails, and shared drives.
0
Total Submissions
0
Average Score
0
Highest Score
0
Lowest Score
Vendor Rankings
Sorted by overall evaluation score. Color-coded bands: green (80+), yellow (60-79), red (below 60).
| Rank | Vendor | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apex Federal Solutions | 94 |
| 2 | Meridian Systems Inc. | 87 |
| 3 | ClearPath Technologies | 76 |
| 4 | Summit Digital Services | 64 |
| 5 | Vanguard Consulting Group | 38 |
Per-evaluator scoring with notes
Each evaluator's individual scores, written notes, and timestamps are captured separately. The dashboard aggregates them into panel averages while preserving the full breakdown.
AI compliance matrix
The AI reads every vendor response against every solicitation requirement and generates a structured compliance assessment. Evaluators know exactly where to focus their review.
Compliant
Vendor response fully addresses the requirement with supporting evidence.
Partially Compliant
Response addresses the requirement but lacks completeness or specificity.
Non-Compliant
Response does not meet the stated requirement or contradicts it.
Missing
No response provided for this requirement.
Evidence-backed assessments
Each compliance determination includes the specific text from the vendor's response that supports the assessment. No black-box conclusions. Evaluators can verify the AI's reasoning against the source material.
Confidence scoring (0-100%)
Every assessment carries a confidence score so evaluators know where to focus their review. High-confidence items can be reviewed quickly. Low-confidence items flag where the AI found ambiguity and human judgment is most needed.
Evaluators remain the decision-makers
AI pre-screens and organizes. Humans judge. The compliance matrix is a starting point for structured evaluation, not a replacement for professional judgment. Every AI-generated assessment can be overridden by the evaluator.
Fit scoring across four dimensions
Vendors are scored on a 0-100 scale across technical approach, past performance, pricing, and an overall weighted composite. Each dimension is visualized so patterns are immediately visible.
Technical
Score: 85/100
Solution architecture, methodology, staffing plan, and technical approach alignment.
Past Performance
Score: 78/100
Relevant contract history, CPARS ratings, references, and demonstrated capability.
Pricing
Score: 91/100
Cost realism, price reasonableness, rate competitiveness, and total evaluated price.
Overall
Score: 84/100
Weighted composite score across all evaluation dimensions.
Multi-evaluator support
Built for evaluation panels, not solo reviewers. Every evaluator works independently, and the platform handles aggregation, note-keeping, and audit compliance automatically.
Independent scoring
Multiple evaluators score the same submission without visibility into each other's assessments. No cross-contamination between evaluator reviews.
Panel averaging
Scores are automatically averaged across the evaluation panel, giving you a consensus view alongside individual breakdowns.
Timestamped notes
Every evaluator note is captured with a timestamp, creating a detailed record of the evaluation thought process.
Full audit trail
Score history is maintained for every change. See who scored what, when, and any revisions made during the evaluation period.
Split-panel review interface
A purpose-built evaluation UX that puts requirements and vendor responses side by side. No more jumping between documents or losing your place.
Requirements Panel
Vendor Response
Technical Approach
Vendor response content appears here with full formatting. Evaluators can read, annotate, and tag compliance status without leaving this view.
Requirement navigation
Left panel displays a scrollable list of all solicitation requirements with completion status indicators, so evaluators always know where they stand.
Vendor response view
Right panel shows the vendor's response to the selected requirement, including attachments, compliance status, and response format details.
Attachment slot matching
Proposal documents are matched to required attachment slots, making it easy to verify that vendors submitted everything the solicitation asked for.
Inline compliance tagging
Evaluators can tag compliance levels directly in the split-panel view without switching screens or losing context.
Frequently asked questions
See AI evaluation in action
Request a live demo and see how Projectory Gov transforms proposal evaluation from weeks of spreadsheet review into a structured, auditable, AI-assisted workflow.